hey thanks all for the suggestions, didn't have time to look into them yet as we're feature-sprinting for MWC, but will report back with some feedback over the next weeks (we will have a few more performance sprints in March)
Best, Matthias On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> > wrote: >> One way to speed up numeric range queries (at the cost of increased >> index size) is to lower the precisionStep. You could try changing >> this from 8 to 4 and then re-indexing to see how that affects your >> query speed. > > Your issue, and the fact that I had been looking at the post-filtering > code again for another client, reminded me that I had been planning on > implementing post-filtering for spatial. It's now checked into trunk. > > If you have the ability to use trunk, you can add a high cost (like > cost=200) along with cache=false to trigger it. > > More details here: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2012/02/10/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/ > > -Yonik > lucidimagination.com -- Matthias Käppler Lead Developer API & Mobile Qype GmbH Großer Burstah 50-52 20457 Hamburg Telephone: +49 (0)40 - 219 019 2 - 160 Skype: m_kaeppler Email: matth...@qype.com Managing Director: Ian Brotherston Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 95913 This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail and its attachments. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail and its attachments is strictly forbidden. This notice also applies to future messages.
