Hello,

I wanted to switch to new version of solr, exactelly to 3.5 but im getting
big drop of indexing speed.

I'm using 3.1 and after few tests i discower that 3.4 do it a lot of better
then 3.5

My schema is really simple few field using "text" type field

/    <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="100" autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true">
      <analyzer type="index">
        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
        
        
        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
                ignoreCase="true"
                words="stopwords.txt"
                enablePositionIncrements="true"
                />
        <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory"
generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1"
catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
        <filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
protected="protwords.txt"/>
        <filter class="solr.HunspellStemFilterFactory"
dictionary="pl_PL.dic" affix="pl_PL.aff"/>
        <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
      </analyzer>
      <analyzer type="query">
        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
        <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt"
ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
                ignoreCase="true"
                words="stopwords.txt"
                enablePositionIncrements="true"
                />
        <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory"
generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0"
catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
        <filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
protected="protwords.txt"/>
        <filter class="solr.HunspellStemFilterFactory"
dictionary="pl_PL.dic" affix="pl_PL.aff"/>
        <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
      </analyzer>
    </fieldType>
/



All data and configuration are the same, same schema, solrconfig, same
jetty.

*SOLR 3.5*
/Feb 22, 2012 3:40:33 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy onInit
INFO: SolrDeletionPolicy.onInit: commits:num=1
       
commit{dir=/vol/home/mciurla/proj/solr/accordion3.5/example/solr/data/index,segFN=segments_bl,version=1329831219365,generation=417,filenames=[_a5.fdx,
_52.fdx, _aq.frq,
_a5.fdt, _cr.nrm, _52.fnm, _a5.prx, segments_bl, _52.fdt, _7k.tii, _cr.frq,
_a5.tis, _cr.fdt, _a5.nrm, _cr.prx, _cp.prx, _cr.fdx, _cn.nrm, _52.tvf,
_cp.fnm, _co.tii, _52.tvd, _8
o.tvx, _co.tis, _8o.tii, _a5.fnm, _8o.tvd, _7k.tis, _8o.tvf, _bb.tis,
_7k.fdx, _7k.fdt, _7k.frq, _bb.tii, _cn.frq, _co.prx, _aq.tii, _cq.fdx,
_52.tii, _cm.tis, _cq.fdt, _aq.tis,
 _52.tis, _aq.tvx, _co.nrm, _bb.prx, _cm.tii, _cr.fnm, _aq.tvf, _bb_3.del,
_aq.tvd, _cm.frq, _cp.nrm, _cq.tis, _52.prx, _cn.tis, _8o.fnm, _cl.nrm,
_cl.fnm, _a5.tii, _cn.tii, _cq
.tii, _cp.tis, _cp.fdt, _cl.fdt, _cl.prx, _aq.fdt, _cl.fdx, _cr.tis,
_co.frq, _7k.fnm, _cq.frq, _bb.fnm, _cr.tii, _cp.fdx, _cp.tii, _aq.fdx,
_cq.tvd, _8o.fdt, _cq.tvf, _52.nrm,
_8o.nrm, _aq.fnm, _8o.prx, _co.tvd, _cq.tvx, _52.frq, _bb.nrm, _bb.fdt,
_cp.tvf, _a5.tvx, _cp.tvd, _cn.tvx, _7k.nrm, _bb.fdx, _cm.tvx, _cm.fdx,
_cl.tvf, _cp.tvx, _co.fdx, _cl.tv
d, _cn.tvf, _a5.frq, _cm.fdt, _a5.tvf, _co.fdt, _a5.tvd, _cp.frq, _cn.fdt,
_cm.nrm, _7k_d.del, _cn.fdx, _52_1e.del, _7k.prx, _8o.fdx, _cn.prx, _cl.tis,
_cq.nrm, _7k.tvx, _cq.prx
, _cn.tvd, _cl.tii, _cm.fnm, _7k.tvd, _cm.prx, _8o.tis, _cm.tvf, _52.tvx,
_7k.tvf, _cl.tvx, _cm.tvd, _a5_9.del, _bb.tvf, _bb.tvd, _cr.tvd, _co.tvf,
_bb.tvx, _cr.tvf, _co.fnm, _a
q.prx, _cl.frq, _cq.fnm, _aq_9.del, _bb.frq, _8o.frq, _aq.nrm, _co.tvx,
_8o_t.del, _cr.tvx, _cn.fnm, _cl_6.del]
Feb 22, 2012 3:40:33 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy
updateCommits
INFO: newest commit = 1329831219365
Feb 22, 2012 3:40:47 PM org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
*INFO: {add=[2271874, 2271875, 2271876, 2271877, 2271878, 2271879, 2271880,
2271881, ... (100 adds)]} 0 14213*
Feb 22, 2012 3:40:47 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/update params={} status=0 QTime=14213
/
when on solr 3.4
/Feb 22, 2012 3:42:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy onInit
INFO: SolrDeletionPolicy.onInit: commits:num=1        
commit{dir=/vol/home/mciurla/proj/solr/accordion3.4/example/solr/data/index,segFN=segments_29,version=1329918470592,generation=81,filenames=[_2b.tvf,
_2c.tvx, _2d.tvf, _2f.tvx, _2d.tvd, _15.prx, _15.frq, _2b.tvd, _2c.nrm,
_20.fnm, _2b.tvx, _2c.fdx, _2c.prx, _2f.tii, _2f.tvf, _20.tvx, _2b.fnm,
_2c.fdt, _2d.tis, _15.fdt, _20.frq, _2d.tvx, _2f.tvd, _15.fdx, _15.fnm,
_2c.tvf, _2e.frq, _2e.prx, _2c.tvd, _2b.frq, _20.tvd, _2c.fnm, _20.tvf,
_2e.tvf, _2e.nrm, _20.tis, _2b.prx, _20.tii, _2e.tvd, _15.tis, _2f.frq,
_15.tii, _2e.tvx, _2e.tii, _2c.tis, _2c.frq, _2e.fdx, _2f.prx, _2f.fnm,
_15.tvx, _2e.fdt, _15.tvf, _2b.tis, _2c.tii, _2d.prx, _2d.fnm, _20.fdx,
_2b.tii, _2e.tis, _20.fdt, _2d.frq, _2b.nrm, _15.tvd, _15_b.del, _2b.fdt,
_2f.nrm, _2d.fdx, segments_29, _2d.fdt, _2b.fdx, _20_2.del, _15.nrm,
_2f.tis, _2d.tii, _2d.nrm, _20.prx, _20.nrm, _2e.fnm, _2f.fdt, _2f.fdx] Feb
22, 2012 3:42:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy updateCommits
INFO: newest commit = 1329918470592 
Feb 22, 2012 3:42:56 PM org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish 
*INFO: {add=[2269393, 2269394, 2269395, 2269396, 2269397, 2269398, 2269399,
2269400, ... (100 adds)]} 0 145 
*Feb 22, 2012 3:42:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: []
webapp=/solr path=/update params={} status=0 QTime=145/


*Any idea what is going on?*

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-3-5-and-indexing-performance-tp3766653p3766653.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to