Nope. Information about your higher level use-case would probably be a good thing, this is starting to smell like an "XY" problem.
Best Erick On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER <marc.schneide...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your answer. > Yes it works in this case when I know the facet name (Computer). What > if I want to automatically compute all facets? > facet.query=keyword:* short_title:* doesn't work, right? > > Marc. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> facet.query=keywords:computer short_title:computer >> seems like what you're asking for. >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER >> <marc.schneide...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for your answer. >>> Let's say I have to fields : 'keywords' and 'short_title'. >>> For these fields I'd like to make a faceted search : if 'Computer' is >>> stored in at least one of these fields for a document I'd like to get >>> it added in my results. >>> doc1 => keywords : 'Computer' / short_title : 'Computer' >>> doc2 => keywords : 'Computer' >>> doc3 => short_title : 'Computer' >>> >>> In this case I'd like to have : Computer (3) >>> >>> I don't see how to solve this with facet.query. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marc. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Have you considered facet.query? You can specify an arbitrary query >>>> to facet on which might do what you want. Otherwise, I'm not sure what >>>> you mean by "faceted search using two fields". How should these fields >>>> be combined into a single facet? What that means practically is not at >>>> all obvious from your problem statement. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER >>>> <marc.schneide...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to make a faceted search using two fields. I want to have a >>>>> single result and not a result by field (like when using >>>>> facet.field=f1,facet.field=f2). >>>>> I don't want to use a copy field either because I want it to be >>>>> dynamic at search time. >>>>> As far as I know this is not possible for Solr 3.x... >>>>> But I saw a new parameter named "group.facet" for Solr4. Could that >>>>> solve my problem? If yes could somebody give me an example? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Marc.
