On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why doesn't this example have to
>> use _val_? Is there an assumed defType of fund?
>
> Yeah, that wiki page is misleading there, as it is implying a non-specified
> defType=func. Wanna fix up the wiki to make this clear?
Yup.
>
> _val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
> (e)dismay's bf, or dismay's boost params.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2012, at 08:43 , Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
>> disassembling and partially rescoring queries. Every helpful response
>> (thanks) has led me to further reading, and this leads to more
>> questions. If I haven't before, I'll apologize now for the high level
>> of ignorance at which I'm starting. This morning I'm wading in the
>> pool of subqueries.
>>
>> An example from the wiki:
>>
>> q=product(popularity, query({!dismax qf=text v='solr rocks'}))
>>
>> What's the use/net effect of having a Q that amounts to a number? The
>> final number becomes the score, yes? Why doesn't this example have to
>> use _val_? Is there an assumed defType of func?
>>
>> Reading QueryValueSource.java, I'm wondering about the speed of
>> something like this, or, more to the point, something like a
>> calculation on two queries. Does this iteratively run the subquery for
>> each document otherwise under consideration? I see some code that
>> might be an optimization here.
>>
>> I'm also wondering, is there a way to express that I only want to see
>> results that meet some threshold value for a subquery?
>>
>> Does _val_ (or the local param syntax) manufacture a field that
>> appears in returned documents? If so, is its name _val_? In which
>> case, can there be more than one?
>
