I'm not at the office until next Wednesday, and I don't have my Solr under hand, but isn't debugQuery=on giving informations only about q parameter matching and nothing about fq parameter? Or do you mean "parsed_filter_querie"s gives information about fq?
CATEGORY_ANALYZED is being populated by a copyField instruction in schema.xml, and has the same field type as my catchall field, the search field for my searchHandler (the one being used by q parameter). CATEGORY (a string) is copied in CATEGORY_ANALYZED (field type is text) CATEGORY (a string) is copied in catchall field (field type is text), and a lot of other fields are copied too in that catchall field. So as far as I can see, the same analysis should be done in both cases, but obviously I'm missing something, and the only thing I can think of is a different behavior between q and fq parameter. I'll check that parsed_filter_querie first thing in the morning next Wednesday. Thanks a lot for your help. Elisabeth 2012/4/24 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > Elisabeth: > > What shows up in the debug section of the response when you add > &debugQuery=on? There should be some bit of that section like: > "parsed_filter_queries" > > My other question is "are you absolutely sure that your > CATEGORY_ANALYZED field has the correct content?". How does it > get populated? > > Nothing jumps out at me here.... > > Best > Erick > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:55 AM, elisabeth benoit > <elisaelisael...@gmail.com> wrote: > > yes, thanks, but this is NOT my question. > > > > I was wondering why I have multiple matches with q="hotel de ville" and > no > > match with fq=CATEGORY_ANALYZED:"hotel de ville", since in both case I'm > > searching in the same solr fieldType. > > > > Why is q parameter behaving differently in that case? Why do the quotes > > work in one case and not in the other? > > > > Does anyone know? > > > > Thanks, > > Elisabeth > > > > 2012/4/24 Jeevanandam <je...@myjeeva.com> > > > >> > >> usage of q and fq > >> > >> q => is typically the main query for the search request > >> > >> fq => is Filter Query; generally used to restrict the super set of > >> documents without influencing score (more info. > >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#q< > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#q> > >> ) > >> > >> For example: > >> ------------ > >> q="hotel de ville" ===> returns 100 documents > >> > >> q="hotel de ville"&fq=price:[100 To *]&fq=roomType:"King size Bed" ===> > >> returns 40 documents from super set of 100 documents > >> > >> > >> hope this helps! > >> > >> - Jeevanandam > >> > >> > >> > >> On 24-04-2012 3:08 pm, elisabeth benoit wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I'd like to resume this post. > >>> > >>> The only way I found to do not split synonyms in words in synonyms.txt > it > >>> to use the line > >>> > >>> <filter class="solr.**SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt" > >>> ignoreCase="true" expand="true" > >>> tokenizerFactory="solr.**KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > >>> > >>> in schema.xml > >>> > >>> where tokenizerFactory="solr.**KeywordTokenizerFactory" > >>> > >>> instructs SynonymFilterFactory not to break synonyms into words on > white > >>> spaces when parsing synonyms file. > >>> > >>> So now it works fine, "mairie" is mapped into "hotel de ville" and > when I > >>> send request q="hotel de ville" (quotes are mandatory to prevent > analyzer > >>> to split hotel de ville on white spaces), I get answers with word > >>> "mairie". > >>> > >>> But when I use fq parameter (fq=CATEGORY_ANALYZED:"hotel de ville"), it > >>> doesn't work!!! > >>> > >>> CATEGORY_ANALYZED is same field type as default search field. This > means > >>> that when I send q="hotel de ville" and fq=CATEGORY_ANALYZED:"hotel de > >>> ville", solr uses the same analyzer, the one with the line > >>> > >>> <filter class="solr.**SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt" > >>> ignoreCase="true" expand="true" > >>> tokenizerFactory="solr.**KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>. > >>> > >>> Anyone as a clue what is different between q analysis behaviour and fq > >>> analysis behaviour? > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot > >>> Elisabeth > >>> > >>> 2012/4/12 elisabeth benoit <elisaelisael...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> oh, that's right. > >>>> > >>>> thanks a lot, > >>>> Elisabeth > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2012/4/11 Jeevanandam Madanagopal <je...@myjeeva.com> > >>>> > >>>> Elisabeth - > >>>>> > >>>>> As you described, below mapping might suit for your need. > >>>>> mairie => hotel de ville, mairie > >>>>> > >>>>> mairie gets expanded to "hotel de ville" and "mairie" at index time. > So > >>>>> "mairie" and "hotel de ville" searchable on document. > >>>>> > >>>>> However, still white space tokenizer splits at query time will be a > >>>>> problem as described by Markus. > >>>>> > >>>>> --Jeevanandam > >>>>> > >>>>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, elisabeth benoit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > <<Have you tried the "=>' mapping instead? Something > >>>>> > <<like > >>>>> > <<hotel de ville => mairie > >>>>> > <<might work for you. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Yes, thanks, I've tried it but from what I undestand it doesn't > solve > >>>>> my > >>>>> > problem, since this means hotel de ville will be replace by mairie > at > >>>>> > index time (I use synonyms only at index time). So when user will > ask > >>>>> > "hôtel de ville", it won't match. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > In fact, at index time I have mairie in my data, but I want user > to be > >>>>> able > >>>>> > to request "mairie" or "hôtel de ville" and have mairie as answer, > and > >>>>> not > >>>>> > have mairie as an answer when requesting "hôtel". > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > <<To map `mairie` to `hotel de ville` as single token you must > escape > >>>>> your > >>>>> > white > >>>>> > <<space. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > <<mairie, hotel\ de\ ville > >>>>> > > >>>>> > <<This results in a problem if your tokenizer splits on white > space > >>>>> at > >>>>> > query > >>>>> > <<time. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Ok, I guess this means I have a problem. No simple solution since > at > >>>>> query > >>>>> > time my tokenizer do split on white spaces. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I guess my problem is more or less one of the problems discussed in > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> http://lucene.472066.n3.**nabble.com/Multi-word-** > >>>>> synonyms-td3716292.html#**a3717215< > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-word-synonyms-td3716292.html#a3717215 > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Thanks a lot for your answers, > >>>>> > Elisabeth > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 2012/4/10 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >> Have you tried the "=>' mapping instead? Something > >>>>> >> like > >>>>> >> hotel de ville => mairie > >>>>> >> might work for you. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Best > >>>>> >> Erick > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:41 AM, elisabeth benoit > >>>>> >> <elisaelisael...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> >>> Hello, > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> I've read several post on this issue, but can't find a real > solution > >>>>> to > >>>>> >> my > >>>>> >>> multi-words synonyms matching problem. > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> I have in my synonyms.txt an entry like > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> mairie, hotel de ville > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> and my index time analyzer is configured as followed for > synonyms. > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> <filter class="solr.**SynonymFilterFactory" > synonyms="synonyms.txt" > >>>>> >>> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> The problem I have is that now "mairie" matches with "hotel" and > I > >>>>> would > >>>>> >>> only want "mairie" to match with "hotel de ville" and "mairie". > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> When I look into the analyzer, I see that "mairie" is mapped into > >>>>> >> "hotel", > >>>>> >>> and words "de ville" are added in second and third position. To > >>>>> change > >>>>> >>> that, I tried to do > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> <filter class="solr.**SynonymFilterFactory" > synonyms="synonyms.txt" > >>>>> >>> ignoreCase="true" expand="true" > >>>>> >>> tokenizerFactory="solr.**KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> (as I read in > >>>>> one > >>>>> post) > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> and I can see now in the analyzer that "mairie" is mapped to > "hotel > >>>>> de > >>>>> >>> ville", but now when I have query "hotel de ville", it doesn't > match > >>>>> at > >>>>> >> all > >>>>> >>> with "mairie". > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Anyone has a clue of what I'm doing wrong? > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> I'm using Solr 3.4. > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Thanks, > >>>>> >>> Elisabeth > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
