Jason, If I just use stock Solr 4.0 without modifying the source code, does that mean multi-value faceting will be very slow when I'm constantly inserting/updating documents?
Which open source library are you referring to? Will Solr adopt this per-segment approach any time soon? Thanks ________________________________ From: Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Nrt and caching Andy, You'd need to hack on the Solr code, specifically the SimpleFacets class. Solr uses UnInvertedField to build an in memory doc -> terms mapping, which would need to be cached per-segment. Then you'd need to aggregate the resultant per-segment counts. There is another open source library that has taken the same basic faceting approach (it is per-segment), and could be colloquially faster, however it is built for Lucene 3.x at the moment. On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Andy <angelf...@yahoo.com> wrote: > So If I want to use multi-value facet with NRT I'd need to convert the > cache to per-segment? How do I do that? > > Thanks. > > > ________________________________ > From: Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: Nrt and caching > > The field caches are per-segment, which are used for sorting and basic > [slower] facets. The result set, document, filter, and multi-value facet > caches are [in Solr] per-multi-segment. > > Of these, the document, filter, and multi-value facet caches could be > converted to be [performant] per-segment, as with some other Apache > licensed Lucene based search engines. > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com > >wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jason Rutherglen > > <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Currently the caches are stored per-multiple-segments, meaning after > each > > > 'soft' commit, the cache(s) will be purged. > > > > Depends which caches. Some caches are per-segment, and some caches > > are top level. > > It's also a trade-off... for some things, per-segment data structures > > would indeed turn around quicker on a reopen, but every query would be > > slower for it. > > > > -Yonik > > http://lucidimagination.com > > >
