Hi Pavel, I tried with group.ngroups=false but didn't notice a big improvement. The times were still about 4000 ms. It doesn't solve my problem. Maybe this is because of my index type. I have millions of documents but only about 20 000 groups.
Cheers Agnieszka 2012/7/16 Pavel Goncharik <pavel.goncha...@gmail.com> > Hi Agnieszka , > > if you don't need number of groups, you can try leaving out > group.ngroups=true param. > In this case Solr apparently skips calculating all groups and delivers > results much faster. > At least for our application the difference in performance > with/without group.ngroups=true is significant (have to say, we use > Solr 3.6). > > WBR, > Pavel > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Agnieszka Kukałowicz > <agnieszka.kukalow...@usable.pl> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is the any way to make grouping searches more efficient? > > > > My queries look like: > > > /select?q=query&group=true&group.field=id&group.facet=true&group.ngroups=true&facet.field=category1&facet.missing=false&facet.mincount=1 > > > > For index with 3 mln documents query for all docs with group=true takes > > almost 4000ms. Because queryResultCache is not used next queries take a > > long time also. > > > > When I remove group=true and leave only faceting the query for all docs > > takes much more less time: for first time ~ 700ms and next runs only > 200ms > > because of queryResultCache being used. > > > > So with group=true the query is about 20 time slower than without it. > > Is it possible or is there any way to improve performance with grouping? > > > > My application needs grouping feature and all of the queries use it but > the > > performance of them is to low for production use. > > > > I use Solr 4.x from trunk > > > > Agnieszka Kukalowicz >
