Well silly me... you're right. On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Erick Erickson [via Lucene] < ml-node+s472066n399570...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Well, option 2 won't do you any good, so speed doesn't really matter. > Your response would have a facet count for "dam", all by itself, something > like > > <int name="damned">2</int> > <int name="dame">1</int> > > etc. > > which does not contain anything that lets you reconstruct the title > for autosuggest. > > Best > Erick > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:18 AM, santamaria2 <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3995706&i=0>> > wrote: > > I'll consider using the other methods, but I'd like to know which would > be > > faster among the two approaches mentioned in my opening post. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-query-vs-facet-prefix-for-autocomplete-tp3995199p3995458.html > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-query-vs-facet-prefix-for-autocomplete-tp3995199p3995706.html > To unsubscribe from Wildcard query vs facet.prefix for autocomplete?, click > here<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3995199&code=YXJhdmluZGEucmFvQGNvbnRpZnkuY29tfDM5OTUxOTl8MTgyMTM4MDg2OQ==> > . > NAML<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-query-vs-facet-prefix-for-autocomplete-tp3995199p3995707.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
