I cant think of a way you can achieve this in one request. Can you make two different solr requests? If so, you can make on with fq=PaidSearch:0 & other with fq=padidSearch:[1:*] .
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nicholas Ding <nicholas...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thank you, but I don't want to filter those ads. > > For example, when user make a search like q=Car > Result list: > 1. Ford Automobile (score 10) > 2. Honda Civic (score 9) > ... > ... > ... > 99. Paid Ads (score 1, Ad has own field to identify it's an Ad) > > What I want to find is a way to make the score of "Paid Ads" higher than > "Ford Automobile". Basically, the result structure will look like > > - [Paid Ads Section] > [Most valuable Ads 1] > [Most valuable Ads 2] > [Less valuable Ads 1] > [Less valuable Ads 2] > - [Relevant Results Section] > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj < > karthick.soundara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > You might add an int field "Search Rule" that identifies the type > of > > search. > > example > > Search Rule Description > > 0 Unpaid Search > > 1 Paid Search - > Rule > > 1 > > 2 Paid Serch - > Rule 2 > > > > You can use filterqueries ( > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters) > > like fq: Search Rule :[1 TO *] > > > > Alternatively, You can even use a boolean field to identify whether or > not > > a search is paid and then an addtitional field that identifies the type > of > > paid search. > > > > -- > > karthick > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Nicholas Ding <nicholas...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I'm working on Solr to build a local business search in China. We have > a > > > special requirement from advertiser. When user makes a search, if the > > > results contain paid advertisements, those ads need to be moved on the > > top > > > of results. For different ads, they have detailed rules about which > comes > > > first. > > > > > > Could anyone offer me some suggestions how I customize the ranking > based > > on > > > my requirement? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Nicholas > > > > > >
