Yes, I meant the same (not -zkRun). However, I was asking if it is safe to have zookeeper and solr processes running on the same node or better on different machines?
On 21 November 2012 21:18, Rafał Kuć <r....@solr.pl> wrote: > Hello! > > As I told I wouldn't use the Zookeeper that is embedded into Solr, but > rather setup a standalone one. > > -- > Regards, > Rafał Kuć > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch > > > First of all: thank you for your answers. Yes, I meant side by side > > configuration. I think the worst case for ZKs here is to loose two of > them. > > However, I'm going to use 4 availability zones in same region so at least > > this will reduce the risk of loosing both of them at the same time. > > Regards. > > > On 21 November 2012 17:06, Rafał Kuć <r....@solr.pl> wrote: > > >> Hello! > >> > >> Zookeeper by itself is not demanding, but if something happens to your > >> nodes that have Solr on it, you'll loose ZooKeeper too if you have > >> them installed side by side. However if you will have 4 Solr nodes and > >> 3 ZK instances you can get them running side by side. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Rafał Kuć > >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - > ElasticSearch > >> > >> > Separate is generally nice because then you can restart Solr nodes > >> > without consideration for ZooKeeper. > >> > >> > Performance-wise, I doubt it's a big deal either way. > >> > >> > - Mark > >> > >> > On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Marcin Rzewucki <mrzewu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I have 4 solr collections, 2-3mn documents per collection, up to 100K > >> >> updates per collection daily (roughly). I'm going to create > SolrCloud4x > >> on > >> >> Amazon's m1.large instances (7GB mem,2x2.4GHz cpu each). The > question is > >> >> what about zookeeper? It's going to be external ensemble, but is it > >> better > >> >> to use same nodes as solr or dedicated micro instances? Zookeeper > does > >> not > >> >> seem to be resources demanding process, but what would be better in > this > >> >> case ? To keep it inside of solrcloud or separately (micro instances > >> seem > >> >> to be enough here) ? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks in advance. > >> >> Regards. > >> > >> > >
