Hi, If you don't need to shard your index and don't need NRT search Solr 3.x is much simpler to operate and is more mature.
Otis Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Jan 4, 2013 7:08 AM, "Dikchant Sahi" <contacts...@gmail.com> wrote: > As someone in the forum correctly said, if all Solr releases were > evolutionary Solr 4.0 is revolutionary. It has lots of improvement over the > previous releases like NoSql features, atomic updates, cloud features and > lot more. > > Solr 4.0 would be the right migration I believe. > > Can someone in the forum provide a reason to migrate to 3.6.2 and not 4.0 > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:16 PM, vijeshnair <vijeshkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We are starting a new e-com application from this month onwards, for > which > > I > > am trying to identify the right SOLR release. We were using 3.4 in our > > previous project, bu I have read in multiple blogs and forums about the > > improvements that SOLR 4 has in terms of efficient memory management, > less > > OOMs etc. So my question would be, can I start using SOLR 4 for my new > > project ? Why is it that Apache keeping both 3.6.2 and 4.0 releases in > the > > downloads? Are there any major changes in 4.0 comparing to 3.x, so that I > > should study those changes before getting in to 4.0 ? Please help, so > that > > I can propose 4.0 to my team. > > > > Thanks > > Vijesh Nair > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-2-or-4-0-tp4030527.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
