On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, this is JSON, so right > there it may be better, but for instance I see "v" here which to a regular > human may not be as nice as "value" if that is what "v" stands for.
One goal was to reuse the parsers/parameter names. A completely disjoint set would certainly lead to confusion. Concise *common* abbreviations are fine I think - for example we quickly get used to (and prefer) f(x) over function(variable1) We could add some aliases though. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com
