If you have access to the solr admin screen you have access to how it was analyzed through the "analysis" page. You have to hover over the little abbreviations to see the class in the analysis chain.
Likewise, the admin screen should have access to the raw schema.xml file which _also_ has the analysis chain definition. And if you really don't have access to either of those, and you can't find out how the fields were analyzed, then there's not much that you can do... Best Erick On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:25 PM, S.L <simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote: > James, > > I get no results back and no suggestions for "wrangle" , however I get > suggestions for "wranglr" , and "wrangle" is not present in my index. > > I am just searching for "wrangle" in a field that is created by copying > other fields, as to how it is analyzed I dont have access to it now. > > Thanks. > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Dyer, James <james.d...@ingramcontent.com> > wrote: > > > If "wrangle" is not in your index, and if it is within the max # of > edits, > > then it should suggest it. > > > > Are you getting anything back from spellcheck at all? What is the exact > > query you are using? How is the spellcheck field analyzed? If you're > > using stemming, then "wrangle" and "wrangler" might be stemmed to the > same > > word. (by the way, you shouldn't spellcheck against a stemmed or > otherwise > > heavily-analyzed field). > > > > James Dyer > > Ingram Content Group > > (615) 213-4311 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 1:06 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: DirectSpellChecker not returning expected suggestions. > > > > OK, I just realized that "wrangle" is a proper english word, probably > thats > > why I dont get a suggestion for "wrangler" in this case. How ever in my > > test index there is no "wrangle" present , so even though this is a > proper > > english word , since there is no occurence of it in the index should'nt > > Solr suggest me "wrangler" ? > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:00 PM, S.L <simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I do not get any suggestion (when I search for "wrangle") , however I > > > correctly get the suggestion wrangler when I search for wranglr , I am > > > using the Direct and WordBreak spellcheckers in combination, I have not > > > tried using anything else. > > > > > > Is the distance calculation of Solr different than what Levestien > > distance > > > calculation ? I have set maxEdits to 1 , assuming that this corresponds > > to > > > the maxDistance. > > > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com < > > > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> What do you get then? Suggestions, but not the one you’re looking > for, > > or > > >> is it deemed correctly spelled? > > >> > > >> Have you tried another spellChecker impl, for troubleshooting > purposes? > > >> > > >> ~ David Smiley > > >> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:33 AM, S.L <simpleliving...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi All, > > >> > > > >> > I have a small test index of 400 documents , it happens to have an > > entry > > >> > for "wrangler", When I search for "wranglr", I correctly get the > > >> collation > > >> > suggestion as "wrangler", however when I search for "wrangle" , I do > > not > > >> > get a suggestion for "wrangler". > > >> > > > >> > The Levenstien distance between wrangle --> wrangler is same as the > > >> > Levestien distance between wranglr-->wrangler , I am just wondering > > why > > >> I > > >> > do not get a suggestion for wrangle. > > >> > > > >> > Below is my Direct spell checker configuration. > > >> > > > >> > <lst name="spellchecker"> > > >> > <str name="name">direct</str> > > >> > <str name="field">suggestAggregate</str> > > >> > <str name="classname">solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker</str> > > >> > <!-- the spellcheck distance measure used, the default is the > > >> > internal levenshtein --> > > >> > <str name="distanceMeasure">internal</str> > > >> > <str name="comparatorClass">score</str> > > >> > > > >> > <!-- minimum accuracy needed to be considered a valid > spellcheck > > >> > suggestion --> > > >> > <float name="accuracy">0.7</float> > > >> > <!-- the maximum #edits we consider when enumerating terms: > can > > >> be 1 > > >> > or 2 --> > > >> > <int name="maxEdits">1</int> > > >> > <!-- the minimum shared prefix when enumerating terms --> > > >> > <int name="minPrefix">3</int> > > >> > <!-- maximum number of inspections per result. --> > > >> > <int name="maxInspections">5</int> > > >> > <!-- minimum length of a query term to be considered for > > >> correction > > >> > --> > > >> > <int name="minQueryLength">4</int> > > >> > <!-- maximum threshold of documents a query term can appear to > > be > > >> > considered for correction --> > > >> > <float name="maxQueryFrequency">0.01</float> > > >> > <!-- uncomment this to require suggestions to occur in 1% of > the > > >> > documents --> > > >> > <!-- > > >> > <float name="thresholdTokenFrequency">.01</float> > > >> > --> > > >> > </lst> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
