Robert Swindells wrote: > Christoph Egger wrote: >>> Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 14:18:16 +0000, Christoph Egger wrote: >>>>> struct device * -> device_t, no functional changes intended. >>>> Why don't you cmp(1) the objects before and after to verify that? >>>> "Same object code generated" is, unlike intentions, something >>>> that can be verified. >>> A fair number won't be the same, I would guess half our SCSI >>> drivers are currently broken. >>> >>> Do a search in sys/dev/ic for 'adapt_dev', any driver that casts >>> this to a softc instead of calling device_private() will crash. > >> The cast is a bug in drivers which have >> the device_t/softc split already done. It is harmless >> for those not yet splitted. > > Maybe ahc(4) was the only one that was broken. The point is that you > could have found this by comparing the object files.
As Izumi said, struct device * and device_t are equal. Replacing a cast with device_private() generates different object code, because device_private() is a function call. Christoph
