On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:05:36PM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote: > On Sat, 16 May 2009, Andrew Doran wrote: > > Thanks! How about this to avoid potential sign compare issues? I forgot > > to e-mail you about it earlier. > > > > @@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ typedef struct vnode vnode_t; > > /* > > * v_usecount; see the comment in vfs_subr.c > > */ > > -#define VC_XLOCK 0x80000000 > > -#define VC_MASK 0x7fffffff > > +#define VC_XLOCK 0x40000000 > > +#define VC_MASK (0xffffffff & ~VC_XLOCK) > > It may be easier and safer to use 0x7fffffffUL.
Or __BIT()/__BITS() et cetera. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
