Hey Andrew,
Andrew Doran wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:36:41PM +0000, Elad Efrat wrote:
Log Message:
Move the implementation of vaccess() to genfs_can_access(), in line with
the other routines of the same spirit.
...
No objections on tech-kern@:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2009/06/21/msg005310.html
48 hours is not long enough, it has been raised with you before. Are you
deliberately trying to piss everyone off? Because it certainly comes over
that way.
Obviously not, and I'm sorry it comes over that way.
To be honest, I think the change in question is fairly simple, and I
made sure no KPI changes (vaccess vanishing) happen; as with any other
change I've made in the past, if anyone finds anything wrong with it, it
will either be fixed or backed out.
I understand where you're coming from, but I think we all need to
understand that one can't spend weeks waiting for comments on trivial
changes -- we should acknowledge that people contribute in their free
time, which may be in "bursts" (at least that's how it is for me...),
and learn to live with the implications.
Are there any technical issues with this change?
Thanks, and sorry again if it seems as if I'm rushing stuff in,
-e.
