On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:11:02PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2:06am, jruoho...@iki.fi (Jukka Ruohonen) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys
>
> | On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:47:37PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | > While here, simplify the code and remove the IPSEC_NAT_T option; always
> | > compile nat-traversal in so that it does not bitrot.
> |
> | By the way, while I can understand INET6, what is the purpose of INET?
> | Funny that even src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c claims to work without it
> | (to the usual funny extent of these #ifdefs).
>
> I don't think that anyone has compiled INET6 recently without INET (if ever).
Ah, maybe IPv6-only hosts would be the rationale then. But as you noted, it
is not difficult to find cases like
#ifdef INET
...
#ifdef INET6
- Jukka.
