On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:24:34AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > INET is really INET4.
Sure; but see below. > > #ifdef INET > > ... > > #ifdef INET6 > > That's a bug; in theory one should be able to have INET6 without INET. > I did try it once several years ago, and had some trouble that I didn't > solve. Not a single instance. In any case, these again cast a shadow on the usefulness or quality of some of the #ifdefs, which are perhaps not even expected to work... or at least contribute to the bitrot that christos also noted in the commit log. - Jukka.
