Masao Uebayashi writes: > Of course I can revert changes but I'd point out that pseudo attach > functions were already inconsistent, and I want to fix that > inconsistency.
can you show me these? if they're not taking an (unused) int argument, then they're already not consistent, and should be fixed. > Could you list "a number of" other instances that use `int n'? no. if you want to make this change, that's yours to find and fix. until you've eliminated them all i really insist that you revert your changes to make them not fit what is expected by the system. it should never be the case that it's acceptable to have their be inconsistent prototypes for the system, let alone that aren't actually detected by the compiler. .mrg.