In article <20160318161925.ga27...@britannica.bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: >On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:52:27AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <20160318030154.gb12...@britannica.bec.de>, >> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote: >> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:44:57PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> >> Module Name: src >> >> Committed By: christos >> >> Date: Fri Mar 11 00:44:56 UTC 2016 >> >> >> >> Modified Files: >> >> src/sys/sys: cdefs_elf.h >> >> >> >> Log Message: >> >> Undo weak here to fix the tests; will revisit soon. >> > >> >Can you revert this now as it is broken and should not be used to work >> >around binutils bugs? >> >> Did something change? If I revert it all the rump tests fail... > >So we are breaking clang for bugs in binutils now?
I am trying to accommodate both compilers. I don't think that the people maintaining binutils believe this is a bug; do they? Is there a PR open for it? christos