On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:33:11PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> Looking at the code in question, is reducing the number of calls to
> addstr() really something that needs to be optimised? A simple
>
> for (n = 0; n < win->ws_col; n++)
> addstr("-");
>
> is a lot easier to understand!
Yeah I wondered that too - are they going to show up sequentially
though, or will it all be defered untill the next update? I often use
it via a 9600bps serial console and would like to avoid incremental
changes.
Martin
