Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:33:11PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Looking at the code in question, is reducing the number of calls to
> > addstr() really something that needs to be optimised? A simple
> >
> > for (n = 0; n < win->ws_col; n++)
> > addstr("-");
> >
> > is a lot easier to understand!
>
> Yeah I wondered that too - are they going to show up sequentially
> though, or will it all be defered untill the next update? I often use
> it via a 9600bps serial console and would like to avoid incremental
> changes.
addstr() just adjusts stdscr. The line after these is:
refresh();
which will do the actual screen refresh/update.
Cheers,
Simon.
