On 25.01.2021 17:19, Jason Thorpe wrote: > >> On Jan 25, 2021, at 6:22 AM, Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have no problem with this change but I am curious why should we use "{ >> }"? It's a C GNU extension and C++ syntax. > > Using { 0 } makes an assumption about the first member of the structure which > is not guaranteed to remain true. >
Both versions should work in the same way, except that {0} is the
standard variation and {} an extension.
I have got no preference for either.
> -- thorpej
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
