On 25.01.2021 17:19, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>> On Jan 25, 2021, at 6:22 AM, Kamil Rytarowski <ka...@netbsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have no problem with this change but I am curious why should we use "{
>> }"? It's a C GNU extension and C++ syntax.
>
> Using { 0 } makes an assumption about the first member of the structure which
> is not guaranteed to remain true.
>
Both versions should work in the same way, except that {0} is the
standard variation and {} an extension.
I have got no preference for either.
> -- thorpej
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
