> On Sep 29, 2021, at 8:15 AM, Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: > > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:37:44 -0700 > From: Jason Thorpe <thor...@me.com> > Message-ID: <39db6c46-94bf-4126-811b-466e5293b...@me.com> > > | Not needed in this case. > | No callers that need the return value are in a module. > > The problem with this argument is that it assumes that you know > every module that exists, anywhere. It might be true of the > modules distributed with NetBSD, without being true of some 3rd > party module.
Anything that depends on the new return value would have simply been doing what the socket / fifo code was doing (groveling around in selinfo internals), so it's not like they're broken as a result of this change. -- thorpej
