> On 2009/12/22 13:10, [email protected] wrote: > > sorry but this is ridiculous. > > the pci ids were already sorted by chipset generation. > > where is it written that pci ids must be sorted by name? > > It makes it easier when comparing ids with drivers in other OS > which are usually sorted that way, and generally reduces the risk > of duplicate entries (admittedly there are few enough in athn(4) > at the moment that they would be fairly easy to notice, but we > have had duplicates before when they have been listed out of > alphanumerical order).
That's bullshit.
