On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15:04PM +0000, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:53:18 -0600 (MDT)
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> 
> > smtpd now uses a ram-queue instead of doing
> > a continuous walk on the disk-queue
> 
> Does that not increase the chances of losing mail if a crash or panic
> occurs? Of course you may deem the performance improvement to be worth
> it?
Something has gone horribly wrong when "losing data" is "worth it" for
"performance".

Reply via email to