On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15:04PM +0000, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:53:18 -0600 (MDT) > Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > smtpd now uses a ram-queue instead of doing > > a continuous walk on the disk-queue > > Does that not increase the chances of losing mail if a crash or panic > occurs? Of course you may deem the performance improvement to be worth > it? Something has gone horribly wrong when "losing data" is "worth it" for "performance".
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Thordur Bjornsson
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src David Gwynne
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Kenneth R Westerback
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Gilles Chehade
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src David Gwynne
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Gilles Chehade
- Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Damien Miller
- CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Markus Friedl
- CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Marco Peereboom
- CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src Marco Peereboom
- CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src David Gwynne
