Rob, --- Robert MacGrogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timo, this is excellent stuff, as I said before. Can't wait to see all of > your changes. And > nothing makes me happier than to have someone else doing bug fixes! > > I'm wondering where you're making your changes. Sometime ago I set you up as > a user of the > SourceJammer archive, but you don't seem to be checking any changes in there. > If you want to check > your changes directly into the dev.sourcejammer.org archive, please feel free > to do so. And if you > need me to remind you of your user name and password, let me know. At the moment i'm doing my changes on my local machine as long as has a stable version locally. But you are right too. I lost my userid/pwd for the sourceforge repository anyway. Can you send it to my private mail account? My changes are based on the 2.1.0.0 version. So how should we handle your changes from the 2.1.1.0 beta release? > > I have my own request about the move/copy dialog. It would be nice if this > defaulted to the > current folder instead of to the root folder. I will try to do so. > > I don't think we can upgrade to the latest jlibdiff. To answer your question, > yes, I made many > modifications, bug fixes, and improvements to the original library, so, > unless we're really > careful, we're stuck with that version. Ok, i only saw there is a newer version of jlibdiff and thought i might be better to update, but in this case we should keep your own version > > Any bugs that are open on SourceForge really are open. It's been a long time > since I've gone > through the bug list. > > All of your long-term items sound great, except for adding old password field > on change password > dialog. We can definitely do this, but I'm not sure of the benefit. If you're > already logged in > (which you have to be to change your password) then we can assume that you > already know your > current password. But if you see a reason for adding this, I won't object. > > Thanks again for doing all this stuff. Glad you're enjoying it. You're > inspiring me to get back > into SJ coding myself. Maybe I'll start looking in to the "big three" > enhancements: > > 1) Concurrent checkout But only optional please... One reason for choosing sourcejammer was the non-concurrent checkout. > 2) An archive search feature (including full text search) That would be really, really nice. > 3) Improving how branching is handled. > > Let me know when you're ready for testing. > > --Rob > > PS: Albert, of course I'll do a new release when Timo's changes are complete! > > --- Timo Haberkern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Albert- > > > > --- Albert Moliner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > SourceJammer-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel > ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************** * Halt! Schon mal * * http://www.fantastic-bits.de * * besucht? * ************************************** __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ SourceJammer-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
