Posted By Josh Rogin  Monday, January 9, 2012 - 3:13 PM   Share
 The State Department tried something new last Friday, answering
selected questions posed via Twitter. Today, a Sudan human rights
organization that was one of the selected questioners called the
answer it got on Sudan policy "unconvincing," "unacceptable," "a
broken record," and "condescending."

The Twitter press conference, where State Department spokeswoman
Victoria Nuland will give answers to questions posed over Twitter
following each Friday press briefing in January, is an experiment in
State's ever-evolving strategy that it has dubbed "21st Century
Statecraft."

Act for Sudan, an alliance of grassroots advocacy organizations,
suggested one of the five tweets that was chosen and answered by
Nuland, but the group is unhappy with the result.

The tweet, sent by @ObSilence but identical to the tweet suggested by
Act for Sudan, was: "Why doesn't @StateDept support regime change in
#Sudan where government-led genocide continues? Why Syria+Libya but
not #Sudan?"

"Well, first of all, ObSilence, each country and each situation is
different," Nuland responded. "But I will say that in Sudan, for many
years, we have continued to press for concrete, meaningful, democratic
reforms and accountability and an end to the violence. We have pushed
hard for an end to the fighting in Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile and
a full resolution of the Darfur conflict. Those responsible for crimes
and crimes against humanity have to be held accountable."

Nuland went on to say that normalization between the United States and
Sudan could only progress when violence ends, and she called on the
government to work with civilians to resolve their issues. She also
acknowledged that "deplorable human rights conditions and unacceptable
practices of bombing innocent civilians and denying humanitarian
access continue."

Act for Sudan put out a release today saying that several of its
members were wholly unsatisfied by that answer, and believed that
Nuland sidestepped the question in a way that downplayed the tragedy
of the human rights situation in Sudan.

"Of course, we realize that all countries and situations are
different, but does the United States of America have no standards
regarding its responsibilities in the face of genocide and crimes
against humanity?" said Eric Cohen, an Act for Sudan spokesman.

"In Libya, with thousand of civilians in danger, President Obama
rightly authorized limited military action to help protect them, and
publicly called for Libya's brutal dictator to step aside," said
Cohen. "Why then, with millions of civilians endangered in Sudan by
their own government, is the U.S. not leading the international
community in its responsibility to protect the people of Sudan, by all
means necessary, including military options? Why are we not leading
the call for the ouster of Sudan's president and his cronies, who are
indicted for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes?"

Act for Sudan coordinated an open letter in November signed by 66
organizations to President Barack Obama asking the United States to
urgently address civilian protection and humanitarian assistance for
Sudanese under attack by their own government. Among other
recommendations, the letter asked Obama to instruct the National
Security Council to accelerate decisions regarding protection of Nuba,
Blue Nile, and Darfuri populations from air attacks and to seriously
consider the destruction of offensive aerial assets and the imposition
of a no-fly zone.  It also requests the immediate initiation of a
cross-border emergency aid program to the Nuba Mountains, Darfur, Blue
Nile and Abyei regions.

The Obama administration may be experimenting with unique ways to
engage with the world through this Twitter press conference, but as
this latest scuffle shows, social media remains a two-way street. And
the Twitter world can now experience what reporters have known all
along - answers given during press conferences rarely fully answer the
question, much less satisfy the questioner.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to