Is UNSC only legitimate to Sudan in complaint times?

By Zechariah Manyok Biar

May 19, 2012 — Sudanese leaders seem to think they are smarter than
anybody else in this world. They seem to recognize the legitimacy of
the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) whenever it is time for
them to complain about something. When the UNSC members agree to deal
with the issue presented to them in a meaningful way, the Sudanese
become selective on what the UNSC members should tell them and what
they should not tell them. They seem to be using the UNSC a means to
their end. This is shown by the complaint the Sudanese lodged with the
UNSC against South Sudan recently over the new South Sudan’s map.

On May 19, 2012, the Undersecretary of the Sudanese Ministry of
Foreign Affairs Rahmatallah Mohamed Osman was quoted by the Sudan
Tribune as saying this: "We call on the Security Council to apply the
necessary measures against the Republic of South Sudan, including
measures relating to the violation of [UNSC) decision."

One wonders what that means legally if one carefully follows how Sudan
behaves in relation to the UNSC and South Sudan!

I do not think the memory of the Undersecretary is that short to
remember that it was the Sudanese Parliament that rejected some
elements of UNSC resolution on May 9, 2012. Not only that, President
Bashir said this on the following day: “We only do the things we want
to do. And no security council or the whole world for the matter can
force us to act otherwise.” Was it the map of South Sudan that let
President Bashir defy the UNSC resolution?

If what constitutes major violation of the resolution is the adding of
disputed areas to any map of the two Sudans, then who has violated the
resolution the most between those who maintain these areas in their
map and occupying them at the same time and those who are adding them
to their map in theory and have withdrawn from them until the solution
is found, as directed by the UNSC resolution 2046?

The Undersecretary seems to have forgotten that it was the same UNSC
resolution 2046 that ordered both the Sudan and South Sudan to
withdraw their forces from the disputed areas and return to the
negotiating table within two weeks. Who is still in the clearly
disputed are of Abyei now? It is the Sudanese army. The police from
South Sudan was verified by the UN last week to have completely pulled
out from Abyei. Who is now violating resolution 2046?

What evidence can the Undersecretary show for Sudan’s respect for the
UNSC? But we can show many examples of Sudan’s disrespect for the
organization. For example, it was the same UNSC which issued a
statement ordering both the Sudanese Government and the rebels in
Southern Kordofan early this year to allow the delivery of aid to
civilians in the area. But the Sudanese Government said on May 16,
2012 that it will not recognize humanitarian surveys in South
Kordofan. Why then did Sudan not listen to UNSC this time if it
follows its directives?

All the above shows that Sudanese leaders really think they are
smarter than anybody else in the international community. They bite
South Sudanese harder and become the first to cry louder that we are
criminals. Will the international community believe these leaders?

Zechariah Manyok Biar lives in Juba, Republic of South Sudan. He can
be reached at [email protected]


The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely
the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the
responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it
to [email protected]

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication.
Please include your full name, relevant personal information and
political affiliations.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to