The NCP: clamour and glamour of dissent

ArticleComments (0)
EmailPrintSave

By Magdi El Gizouli

April 10, 2012 - Divisions in Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party
(NCP) evolved into open conflict on the background of President
Bashir’s declaration that he intends to step down at the end of his
current term in 2015. Ghazi Salah al-Din al-Attabani, the head of the
party’s parliamentary bloc, raised the stakes when he stated that the
interim constitution bars President Bashir from running for a third
term in office. Attabani took the opportunity to voice a wider
criticism of the performance of the government and the ruling party
and declared openly his support for the reform initiatives of the
younger Saihoon dissidents, the rather loose association of committed
Islamists and former Popular Defence Forces (PDF) combatants who
wished to elect him as secretary general of the Islamic Movement last
year. He demanded that the government abide by the constitution and
take concrete measures to lift restrictions on political freedoms if
it was sincere in starting political dialogue with the opposition.

Attabani’s statements followed the announcement by First Vice
President Taha of the government’s willingness to engage all political
forces including the armed opposition in a national ‘constitutional
dialogue’. Taha invited Malik Agar and Abd al-Aziz al-Hilu of the
Sudan People’s Liberation Army/Movement in North Sudan (SPLA/M-N) to
take part the process stressing that partial deals have failed to
resolve Sudan’s problems and that it was time for a comprehensive
approach to Sudan’s multiple conflicts. The government, he said, was
ready to discuss issues of national scope with the SPLA/M-N but only
as part of wider multilateral process. The SPLA/M-N dismissed the
government’s offer of a national dialogue as lacking in credibility
but suggested instead a similar process mediated by the African Union
High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP). It was not clear though how
the SPLA/M-N’s own negotiations with the government would relate to
this higher order process

The meeting between Taha and the deputy secretary general of the
Popular Congress Party (PCP) Ali al-Haj was presented by the former as
a first step towards the proposed dialogue. Taha commended Ali al-Haj
for his readiness to gloss over the grievances of the past and
expressed optimism about possible reconciliation between the NCP and
the PCP offering even to meet the PCP chief Hassan al-Turabi. Vice
President al-Haj Adam Yusif did meet Turabi and press reports claimed
that efforts were being made to pave the way for a meeting between
President Bashir and PCP chief. Turabi, nevertheless, continues to
overvalue his worth. A captain of his party said the sheikh was only
ready to discuss an ‘interim’ constitution not a ‘permanent’ one.

President Bashir on his part renewed the pledge to hold a national
dialogue with all political forces in the country in a speech to the
National Assembly. As a gesture of goodwill, the President ordered the
release of all political prisoners in the country. Actually released
until now were a limited number of politicians arrested for signing
the New Dawn Charter, an activist in the protest movement ChangeNow,
and according to one report two security operatives associated with
the former spy chief Salah Gosh who were detained in relation to the
November 2012 coup plot. The presidential pardon has not reached far.
Detainees held for links to the SPLA/M-N and the Darfur rebel
movements remain in custody as do the military and security officers
of the November 2012 coup plot. The in-house rebels of the coup plot
reportedly waived their right to appeal and raised a petition to the
Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) high command asking for clemency under the
blanket of President Bashir’s pardon after a military court sentenced
the army officers to dismissal from service and between two to five
years in prison. The confrontation presented as a David and Goliath
challenge between bold jihad veterans and an ossified military
bureaucracy cooled off to a rather drab negotiation dressed as a court
procedure.

The NCP’s leadership bureau responded to Attabani’s pronouncements
with a decision relieving him of his position as head of the party’s
parliamentary caucus, effectively the entire house. At the same
meeting chaired by President Bashir, Nafie Ali Nafie, the deputy
chairman of the NCP, was named official spokesman, a step that the
party’s deputy spokesman said was meant to discipline the NCP high
priests into line. Nafie busied himself the next day with a visiting
delegation of the Chinese Communist Party. The coincidental chuckle of
history passed unnoticed. Attabani issued a statement to the press
challenging the decision with the argument that he was elected by
fellow parliamentarians and could only be removed through a vote by
the caucus. The allegedly enraged parliamentarians formed a committee
of five to discuss the matter with Nafie, the same man they approached
several times in the past months to pay their lofty car loans. The
calculating Nafie sent them back with the instruction to prepare a
“feasibility study”. Mohamed al-Hassan al-Amin, chairperson of the
parliament’s defence and security committee and one of the brave five
set the limits of their adventure with the statement: “The
parliamentarians will abide by the party’s decision whether they are
convinced or not.”

It would be misleading to speak of a confrontation between hard-liners
led by Nafie who would prefer to see President Bashir in power for
another term and reformers represented by Attabani whose initiatives
are hampered by President Bashir’s continued hold on power. Rather, it
seems competing camps in the regime are pursuing divergent
calculations. Nafie and allies consider President Bashir an asset, a
guarantor of their influence unlikely to accept a political
arrangement that would threaten the grip of the NCP over the state
institutions, let alone expose the security establishment to closer
scrutiny or drop the blanket immunities that protect its members.
Ghazi Salah al-Din al-Attabani and supporters have come to see
President Bashir as a liability and his continuation in office a
threat to the power of the NCP in the short term and the political
chances of the Islamic Movement in any future dispensation. President
Bashir in this calculation is framed as a scapegoat with the bargain
that his elimination would redeem the suppressed reformers inside the
ruling party and the Islamic Movement of the baggage of the NCP’s long
reign. In their pursuits, contenders in the NCP are reaching out to
the opposition, primarily the PCP and the SPLA/M-N, with offers of
dialogue and reconciliation that effectively copy often repeated calls
for a ‘national constitutional conference’, the mantra of the
opposition, with the outlook of buttressing their inside positions
with an external ally. President Bashir and associates believe they
retain considerable headway however, thanks to the slowly
materializing rapprochement with South Sudan, the pledges of the
Darfur donors’ conference and attempts at sealing a strong partnership
with the new Egypt of the Muslim Brotherhood. If and when the
government’s coffers begin to fill up it would be hard to see why the
NCP’s middle ranks outside the Khartoum preserve should opt to back
al-Attabani’s reform agenda rather than stick it out with the Bashir
they know. Indeed, the NCP in Sennar and the While Nile published paid
advertisements in the Khartoum press pleading President Bashir to
reconsider his fateful decision. Come the presidential elections, I
would vote for Insaf Medani and Ayman al-Rubo as running mate.

The author is a fellow of the Rift Valley Institute. He publishes
regular opinion articles and analyses at his blog Still Sudan. He can
be reached at [email protected]





The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely
the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the
responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it
to [email protected]

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication.
Please include your full name, relevant personal information and
political affiliations.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to