South Sudan’s Unity state denies hosting Sudanese rebels

ArticleComments (0)
EmailPrintSave

By Bonifacio Taban Kuich

April 11, 2013 (BENTIU) - Authorities in South Sudan’s Unity state
have denied that Sudanese rebel group, the Justice and Equality
Movement (JEM), have any presence in their territory.


This photo of Sunday, April 15, 2012, shows a soldier from the Darfuri
rebel group Justice and Equality Movement at a South Sudanese position
in Heglig (AP)
The denial from Bentiu follows JEM’s own strongly worded rebuttal last
week of allegations made in a report published by a United Nations
panel of experts on 12 February, which said that the Darfur rebels had
military camps in different areas of South Sudan including a camp near
Bentiu.

"It appears that, in 2012, the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM)
operated a large base for around 800 armed fighters inside South Sudan
at a location near Bentiu, Unity State", the experts said, while
citing other base in Western Bahr el-Ghazal State.

JEM spokesperson, Gibreel Adam Bilal, responded by saying it "is
simply not good enough for a Report of this magnitude and the term
“appears” is not sufficiently definitive to elevate the claim to a
fact status.”

Unity state’s deputy governor Michael Chiengjiek Geay told Sudan
Tribune on Thursday that his government has never hosted a single
rebel from neighboring Sudan.

But he went on to say: “JEM are not longer in our territories to be
very honest I would challenge those who are alleging that to come
themselves and verify of whether they will get them or not. But I’m
sure if they come down today they will find nothing.”

The UN panel of independent experts was established in 2005 after the
peace agreement that led to South Sudan’s independence, to monitor an
arms embargo.

The deputy governor admitted that during the fighting between the
Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and South Sudan’s army (SPLA) in April last
year, over the disputed oil-producing Heglig/Panthou region, the
South’s forces did become mixed up with JEM forces. However he
maintained that there has been no formal cooperation between the two.

“We have never hosted them, but during [the Heglig] operation it
happened that we have seen them also conducting the operation together
with our forces so that was a different situation when people are
fighting you need not to know who are the fighters and who are
fighting alongside this. All in all our main objectives is to defend
our territories and achieve that by fighting hard and pushing back the
enemies”.

JEM began its rebellion against the Sudanese government in Darfur over
10 years ago complaining that the region had been marginalised by
Khartoum. In 2011 JEM and the two other main Darfur rebel groups
formed a coalition - the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) - with the
former northern sector of the SPLA after conflict erupted in South
Kordofan and Blue Nile either side of South Sudan’s independence in
July 2011.

Khartoum has repeatedly accused the SPLA of supporting their former
colleagues in the SPLA-N and the SRF coalition, although this has been
denied by Juba. South Sudan conversely accuses Sudan of backing rebel
groups within its own territory.

Such distrust over border security has defined relations between the
two nations since their divorce but diplomatic ties are improving with
Sudan’s president due to arrive in Juba on Friday to discuss further
implementation of Cooperation Agreement signed last year.

Geay urged both countries move forward as per last months matrix
agreement in Ethiopia to focus on peace building and normalising
relations.

Both countries have faced economic hardship following the South’s
decision to halt oil production over a transit fee dispute last year.
Exports of South Sudanese crude through Sudan recommenced earlier this
week .

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to