On 1/14/09, Jan Pazdziora <jpazdzi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35:49AM +0000, travellig travellig wrote:
>> >>
>> >> osa-dispatcher is only needed if you wanna use osad from the clients.
>> >> Since osad is not a default package, I don't see why osa-dispatcher
>> >> should be installed by default with spacewalk.
>> >
>> > One reason is that if the client in fact installs osad and tries to
>> > use Spacewalk, it won't work.
>>
>> This comes as a surprise since I got osad->osa-dispatcher<->jabberd
>> working nicely in my environment (0.3). I remember though that it was
>> not an straight forward configuration.
>
> Right. On the other hand, if you remove that osa-disparcher and
> jabberd from the server, that osad won't work because it doesn't have
> the server side to connect to.

I would expect that to be the case not just for osad but for any other
client/server scenario ;) I think, I slightly misunderstood where you
were coming from.
>
>> > Another reason for having at least jabberd installed in default
>> > spacewalk installation is bugzilla 479971 -- we create jabberd
>> > configuration, and if would be nice to create it only after the
>> > package was in fact installed, otherwise the files are owned by root
>> > and jabberd won't be able to use them.
>>
>> Any chance of sharing the bugzilla number that states this issue with
>> osad/osa-dispathcer/jabberd?
>
> 479971.

Thanks for that.

-- 
travellig.

_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Reply via email to