-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Today, we have both Spacewalk (and proxy) packages together in one repo > with client packages. > If somebody will install Spacewalk on RHEL he will get as side effect > all those client packages (rhnlib, yum-rhn-plugin, rhn-client-tools), > which will get him to unsupported state. > I'm not sure if this is what we wanted. In fast, we probably do not want > this. > I suggest to split yum repo to two parts. One is Spacewalk and Proxy. > Second is client tools. > > Do you agree? Do you disagree? Any comments? > I completely agree, I would just also add rhnsd to the list: rhn-client-tools rhnlib rhnsd yum-rhn-plugin This looks like the authoritative list when I looked through Koji. Thanks. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKoSzhhwQhj8l1t/cRAj8nAJ9LVSZedf1g66R0IkHo1su+STZ2JgCePqxH fzpxk2Uzxg2I8Krd6YnlvO8= =6obD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
