On 18/02/14 14:10, Michael Mraka wrote: > Using self-closed tags for void elements as well as using end tags even > in situations where they can be omitted in HTML5 is common agreement > among whole team. They improve readability - you immediately know what > was intentional and what a mistake. > > As for patch rejection - no, most likely the other way round :).
I am fine with using self-closing tags as long as everyone is aware that using it in a non-void tag will create bad markup and understand that the browser will just remove the /'s. It happened with <i class="iconclass"/> already, which is wrong and invalid) In HTML5 <foo/> is expanded to <foo>. Not to <foo></foo> as in XHTML. -- Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - http://www.suse.com/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
