On 02.02.2015 15:56, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: > On 02.02.2015 15:06, Cliff Perry wrote: >> Hi folks, >> the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only >> have 8 remaining. >> >> Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was >> branched? >> - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest. >> >> https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pulls >> >> Thanks, >> Cliff > > Hi Cliff, > > there are still some outstanding issues concerning RHEL7/CentOS7 > support. I will try to gather them. Is RHEL7 support still an aim for 2.3? > > Regards > Patrick
So, from my pov the following tickets are still relevant and could/should be considered as blocker for Spacewalk 2.3 on RHEl7: BZ#1189189 - SELinux AVC on CentOS 7.0 with osad (spacewalk 2.3/nightly) BZ#1189184 - RPM fetching via spacewalk proxy fails with 404 on 2.3/nightly BZ#1178151 - Wrong default configuration for Squid 3.3.8 on CentOS7 for Spacewalk 2.3/nightly BZ#1169674 - SWnightly@RHEL7: Error: Package: spacewalk-taskomatic-2.3.94-1.el7.noarch Requires: cglib < 2.2 Best regards Patrick -- Lobster SCM GmbH, Hindenburgstraße 15, D-82343 Pöcking HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
