Hi, I plan to do pretty much the same thing. The way I was thinking of doing it was by cloning the channels and patch/update from the clones. That way the channel stays static between the QA and the prod. The primary/original channel can continue to stay in sync with RHN (or CentOS in your case).
Alan From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Pieter Thysebaert Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 7:49 AM To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com Subject: [Spacewalk-list] Patch/update selection saving and re-applying Hi, I'm looking into setting up SpaceWalk as a way of managing at least the updates/patches applied to our CentOS systems. In particular, I'm wondering whether it is feasible to "save" a selection of updates to install, and push thosed updates to a system some day in the future. To be more precise: let's say we have QA and production machines. Assume we go through this cycle 1. yum update on QA machine 2. test on QA machine 3. if OK, do same thing on production machine Of course, some time may pass between the actions on the QA machine and the production machine so that "yum update" on the QA machine on one day, and then "yum update" on the production machine on a later day may result in different updates and patches (later versions) being installed on the production machine. What would be the recommended way to keep the production machine at the same patchlevel as the QA machine? Is there functionality in Spacewalk to update a machine to the same version/update/patchlevel as another reference machine (ie the QA machine)? Can I save the updates applied to the QA machine, and then only update the production machine using this "selection" somehow? Thanks! Pieter
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
