Hi, You can create and save a stored profile of the QA machine and then apply that to the production one.
You could also script against the API to fetch a list of updates waiting for the QA machine and then script the install to the production one. There's a few guides on writing perl/python to query the Spacewalk API. Cheers, Anton From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Pieter Thysebaert Sent: 08 January 2013 12:49 To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com Subject: [Spacewalk-list] Patch/update selection saving and re-applying Hi, I'm looking into setting up SpaceWalk as a way of managing at least the updates/patches applied to our CentOS systems. In particular, I'm wondering whether it is feasible to "save" a selection of updates to install, and push thosed updates to a system some day in the future. To be more precise: let's say we have QA and production machines. Assume we go through this cycle 1. yum update on QA machine 2. test on QA machine 3. if OK, do same thing on production machine Of course, some time may pass between the actions on the QA machine and the production machine so that "yum update" on the QA machine on one day, and then "yum update" on the production machine on a later day may result in different updates and patches (later versions) being installed on the production machine. What would be the recommended way to keep the production machine at the same patchlevel as the QA machine? Is there functionality in Spacewalk to update a machine to the same version/update/patchlevel as another reference machine (ie the QA machine)? Can I save the updates applied to the QA machine, and then only update the production machine using this "selection" somehow? Thanks! Pieter
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
