Waldirio, Would you please clarify that comment? Are you telling me to create a base channel and a child channel, and then subscribe to the child channel?
Thanks Daryl On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro < waldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Daryl > > Child channel yes, Base channel no! > > Take care > Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <rosed...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> Can I register the same client to two different channels? >> >> Thank you >> >> Daryl >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> >> wrote: >> >>> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate channels >>> on CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the Solaris if I had >>> the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all that much, >>> hopefully someone else can chime in. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> [image: >>> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk] >>> >>> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology * >>> *TruQua* >>> Mobile 630.445.9313 >>> Office 312.525.8790 >>> >>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto: >>> spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose >>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM >>> *To:* spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels >>> >>> >>> >>> Ethan, >>> >>> >>> >>> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the >>> client server, and yes the server had checked in. So, the updates channel >>> was a child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should have >>> known about the child because it was part of the activation key. >>> >>> >>> >>> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and >>> combined everything into a single channel. I know see that there are over >>> 900 updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't >>> like all of patches and packages intermixed. It makes it difficult to >>> figure out whats what. however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all >>> three repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just have >>> to get used to it. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> Daryl >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get the >>> new channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the channel >>> yet. When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is >>> subscribed to by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and you >>> might have checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove the >>> repo or just the channel? >>> >>> >>> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology >>> *TruQua* >>> >>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for >>> patches. However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as >>> well. Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I >>> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image. However, >>> this is what SW is for. A repository of all of the packages, plus updates >>> that may need to be applied. >>> >>> >>> >>> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation packages >>> into it. However, I already had an update channel with a system assigned >>> to it. What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct way to set >>> up the two channels? >>> >>> >>> >>> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the base >>> channel. I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I resubscribed >>> to the base channel. There are over 2000 packages in the base channel, and >>> 381 in the updates channel. I thought that once I resubscribed the server >>> to the base/child updates channel, I would see needed updates. I know that >>> there should be 80 updates needed on this server, however, SW tells me that >>> the system is up to date. >>> >>> >>> >>> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories: Base, >>> Updates and Extra's. All three are then assigned to the CentOS channel. >>> There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS server. Is best >>> practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates together in a single >>> channel so that way the Solaris server can see everything? Why doesn't the >>> client server see the child channel and SW tell me that it needs updates? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> Daryl >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list