Yes Daryl you must subscribe to both channels. You may be subscribed to one base channel and as many of that base's children as you wish.
-Ethan On Nov 14, 2014 10:14 AM, "Daryl Rose" <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Waldirio, > > Would you please clarify that comment? Are you telling me to create a > base channel and a child channel, and then subscribe to the child channel? > > Thanks > > Daryl > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro < > waldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Daryl >> >> Child channel yes, Base channel no! >> >> Take care >> Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <rosed...@gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Can I register the same client to two different channels? >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> Daryl >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate channels >>>> on CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the Solaris if I had >>>> the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all that much, >>>> hopefully someone else can chime in. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> [image: >>>> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk] >>>> >>>> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology * >>>> *TruQua* >>>> Mobile 630.445.9313 >>>> Office 312.525.8790 >>>> >>>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >>>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >>>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >>>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >>>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto: >>>> spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM >>>> *To:* spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ethan, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the >>>> client server, and yes the server had checked in. So, the updates channel >>>> was a child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should have >>>> known about the child because it was part of the activation key. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and >>>> combined everything into a single channel. I know see that there are over >>>> 900 updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't >>>> like all of patches and packages intermixed. It makes it difficult to >>>> figure out whats what. however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all >>>> three repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just have >>>> to get used to it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Daryl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get the >>>> new channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the channel >>>> yet. When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is >>>> subscribed to by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and you >>>> might have checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove the >>>> repo or just the channel? >>>> >>>> >>>> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology >>>> *TruQua* >>>> >>>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >>>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >>>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >>>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >>>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for >>>> patches. However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as >>>> well. Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I >>>> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image. However, >>>> this is what SW is for. A repository of all of the packages, plus updates >>>> that may need to be applied. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation packages >>>> into it. However, I already had an update channel with a system assigned >>>> to it. What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct way to set >>>> up the two channels? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the base >>>> channel. I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I resubscribed >>>> to the base channel. There are over 2000 packages in the base channel, and >>>> 381 in the updates channel. I thought that once I resubscribed the server >>>> to the base/child updates channel, I would see needed updates. I know that >>>> there should be 80 updates needed on this server, however, SW tells me that >>>> the system is up to date. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories: Base, >>>> Updates and Extra's. All three are then assigned to the CentOS channel. >>>> There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS server. Is best >>>> practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates together in a single >>>> channel so that way the Solaris server can see everything? Why doesn't the >>>> client server see the child channel and SW tell me that it needs updates? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Daryl >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
