Am 14. Oktober 2017 01:38:59 MESZ schrieb Paul-Andre Panon <paul-andre.pa...@avigilon.com>: >On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:17:12, Robert Paschedag ><robert.pasche...@web.de> wrote: >> >>Hi all, >> >>after fixing my problems with the errata import, I found another >problem with Debian...especially with >> >>Debian "stretch" and SW 2.7. At least, I did not yet see a major (or >even minor) error with Debian jessie on SW 2.7 >> >>I can successfully deploy a Debian stretch system via SW 2.7, register > >>it and install packages. >> >>The "installed" packages on the client is reported to SW. No problem >so far. >> >>But, even if SW reports, that there are no newer packages in SW for >the >>client, and I have done >> >>"apt-get upgrade" several times, the "client" does not recognize, that >a >>particular package >> > >Hi Robert, > >I can confirm that. I've been experiencing the same thing with Ubuntu >14 clients last month and Ubuntu 16 clients this month. The python >packages had updated and attempts to update kept on cycling through >with the same packages identified as needing updates, until I went >through and manually copied the Multi-Arch: allowed settings for the >packages that had it (looking at the Packages on the Ubuntu repos). I >was thinking of doing what you propose but I've been to busy to dig >into the code to try to add the Multi-Arch field to the copied data. I >look forward to your changes. > >Paul-Andre Panon >Senior systems administrator > > >_______________________________________________ >Spacewalk-list mailing list >Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
Hi Paul-Andre, the big problem is... "allowed" is not the only value for Multi-Arch. In Debian stretch "main" repo, there are 8979 Packages with "Multi-Arch" header. No way to do that by hand. Another thing. I hope you can give me a hint. Apt now tries (or even just generates) "binary-all" package files for all "amd64" repos, the client has subscribed. How can I stop that? All "architecture" settings are set to "amd64". Don't know, where this *feature* came from but it looks like breaking my "workaround" I'm trying to implement. Thanks Robert _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list