http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-12 17:25 ------- Subject: Re: DBs (AWL, Bayes) ought to be able to be put into an SQL Database -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >For tests such as a mass-check with bayes turned on, the SQL based >storage took about 3 times longer to complete. However, put into >practice of calling spamc on a whole bunch of messages I saw a mild >increase in speed, again single CPU box with untuned MySQL server. > >It's just time and resources at this point to see how well it will >perform. Anyone have a good test harness for testing performance of a >particular setup? mass-check is usually what I use. Wierd that spamc seems faster; I guess that's the overhead of tying/untying repeatedly in the spamd case. BTW I plan to check this into 2.70 SVN real soon ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAA0jxQTcbUG5Y7woRAruJAKCZdrOHvx+rfrn7E9aEKSqH5M6jEQCeJu/n bwT6yf9lX1xR43hr3w811o8= =EX6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
