http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3077
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-25 21:43 ------- Subject: Re: spamassassin -d is too damn slow On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:08:56PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > execution time is not a big deal. But when users start operating > on large collections of messages, usually to build a corpus, > the overhead dominates and _is_ noticeable. Sure. And I want to fix the overhead part. ;) How would you feel if 'spamassassin -d' would work on whole mboxes at a time? > But there's still a missing capability in all this: the ability > to sequence over an entire mailbox and/or directory. If the tool > can do that, then the overhead of loading the modules will be > likely lost in the noise. Heh. :) Hence why I asked above. There's another ticket about it already, basically to make 'spamassassin' use ArchiveIterator ala sa-learn + mass-check. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
