http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2419
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-24 07:03 ------- Some recent experience on this... I've actually shifted the weightings somewhat so that the "0" weighting is more around the 30% mark. I think the settings as I originally listed them are good _only_ if all the rest of the rule weightings are scored independent of the Bayes tests. Bayes is then added as an additional correction. My experience is that a well-trained system ranks HAM almost exclusively in the 0-10% range while a lot of spam comes in at the 40-80% range. A message ranking 40% with a score of 1.0 may be just enough to tag it as spam when combined with the other rules. I still believe the weightings originally listed here are good, but (again) only if the GA generates its scores ignoring Bayes output (i.e. scoreset #1). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
