http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3226
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 12:24 -------
Subject: Re: bogus MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, TO_HAS_SPACES, OPT_HEADER tests
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:04:59PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 0.0 TO_HAS_SPACES To: address contains spaces
>
> ignoring BAYES_00 (my trained data) it's clearly fine -- both TO_HAS_SPACES
> and
> MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR are "noise" rules -- informational, rather than "deciding"
> rules, providing tiny scores.
Just an FYI: according to the RFC, the To header in question ("na-digest
list:;") is parsed as:
display-name : ;
where display-name is defined as either a quoted string or a single
"word" (ie: no whitespace), and the blank list between : and ; is the
list of addresses. so the header is, actually, invalid (need to put
the display-name with the space in quotes).
but from our POV -- shouldn't To:addr ignore the display name and in this
case return a blank To address? right now we return "na-digest list:;"
for the above...
IMO, the code should convert the "display-name: mailbox ;" bit to be just
"mailbox", then the rest of our code can rip out the appropriate bits.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
