http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3226
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 12:31 ------- 'but from our POV -- shouldn't To:addr ignore the display name and in this case return a blank To address? right now we return "na-digest list:;" for the above... IMO, the code should convert the "display-name: mailbox ;" bit to be just "mailbox", then the rest of our code can rip out the appropriate bits.' theo -- I think you're right. we might be able to get better quality results from TO_HAS_SPACES that way... that should probably be opened as an RFE bug separately. And regarding the quoting around "na-digest list" as required by RFC-2822, that's probably correct for total RFC compliance! But I don't think it'll make a diff to SA so not a big deal for us ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
