http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-04 11:32 -------
I was very positive we didn't do this, but sure enough in the 2.[56]x code:
if ($self->{conf}->{rewrite_subject}) {
my $subject = $self->{msg}->get_header("Subject") || '';
my $tag = $self->{conf}->{subject_tag};
$tag =~ s/_HITS_/sprintf("%05.2f", $self->{hits})/e;
$tag =~ s/_REQD_/sprintf("%05.2f", $self->{conf}->{required_hits})/e;
I'm not quite sure why we did it that way in 2.6x since we had the Tags code
for
the other headers already... In 3.0, the Tags stuff is the way everything
works, including the Subject header. The new version is:
my $score = sprintf("%2.1f", $self->{score});
So #1: the 3.0 method is more correct, as it uses the same code everything else
does. #2: should we allow some method of passing in the printf format string,
or something similar? ie: _HITS(05.2f)_, or _HITS(1)_ (where 0 is 2.1, and 1
is 05.2)?
Thoughts?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
