http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3301
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-26 16:04 ------- Subject: Re: multiple processes - killing parent doesn't kill the children -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> I wrote the original child limiting code, and I'm pretty sure that >> there were problems as soon as SIGCHLD was handled. I'd bet that we >> need anomie's trick. > >IMO, until it's a reproducable issue, we're not going to go hacking the >code around. we need wider testing. I'm dogfooding 3.0.0, and not seeing problems; but I'd really like more BSDish platforms trying it out on a relatively large scale (like installation on a personal domain mailserver like mine) to be sure. Otherwise we're going to run into the 2.4x SIGCHLD situation again; no bug reports until it's released, then a flood of very-hard-to-reproduce heisenbugs. :( - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAjZVnQTcbUG5Y7woRAkOLAJ9dr8HBJK4z77CCd39PrbURXyN1wQCgx1gT vyyijftW81xPBiBFSDz7hrQ= =/f9h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
