http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-27 11:18 -------
Subject: Re:  spamd configuration from config file

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:54:15AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-27 10:54 -------
> Subject: Re:  spamd configuration from config file 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> >Does anyone have any comments regarding the removal of the bulk of the
> >cmdline arguments in favor of requiring use of a configuration file?
> 
> I'm -1 on that suggestion.  It'll wreak havoc for boot scripts,
> distro packagers, and all sorts of users of spamd.
> 
> Of course, we can move the parsing code into a config-file parser
> thingy, and just move the existing cmdline parsing into there; then
> delegate any unsupported cmdline switches and pass them on into
> the config-file parser.
> 
> That way, we've (a) cleaned up the code and (b) not broken backwards
> compatibility (as long as the switch names remain the same).

Justin, it sounds like you might have some method in mind here.  I'm happy
to give it a shot but if you'd like to give me some sort of spec to work
off of I'm sure my diff's will be better received.





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to