http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-07 11:08 ------- Subject: Re: Contribution of antidrug rules At 10:34 PM 5/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >So, every time T_DRUGS_ERECTILE hits, T_DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU also hits. ditto >for the other OBFU rules. is that by design? (actually, if it isn't, it looks >pretty tricky to avoid anyway, so I'm not bothered.) Can you correct the above statement JM? Do you mean really that every time T_DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU hits, T_DRUGS_ERECTILE hits too? (instead of the other way around) If so, yes, that's by design. The OBFU series is intended to be a "finer brush" offering higher scores to emails trying to disguise drug names. It should also have a much lower risk of FPing on things like viagra joke emails. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
