http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-26 00:22 ------- According your logic AWL is very sucks. AWL create scores for example between -4 and +2 with parameters auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 1 auto_learn_threshold_spam 13.0 required_hits 7 it is equivalent to rewritten AWL (+4 to all) AWL will create scores between 0 and +6 with parameters auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 5 auto_learn_threshold_spam 17.0 required_hits 11 AWL generate +4 for many many hams. This rule sucks! It is your logic. Why are use AWL? Why AWL implemented in SA? AWL sucks more than my rule. ---------------------- I think AWL and my rule not sucks. This is whitelisted rules, like 0.001 scores in Bayes rules. They are diffrent. but they are very effective. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
